Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-4093783-20160508161618/@comment-4093783-20160508205339

Lord Andrew Mallace wrote: Nults McKagan wrote: Lord Andrew Mallace wrote: the first two, the third. By the time the chat mod OR rollback request is brought up, said user will already have had voting power for some time. For example, when Waglington was promoted from Chat mod to chat mod and rollback, he had already held responsibility and voting rights for over 3 months. Holding an entire different vote to give him such a rarely used power is pointless, especially when he had a clean slate and nobody would have opposed. The community should never be bypassed when SSC voting rights are on the line. It doesn't matter if "nobody would oppose this person anyways." If you wanna bypass people to make some useless rollback promotion then whatever, but if you're going to give them SSC voting powers without the community's consent then you're gonna have some problems on your hand.

You did not read my post correctly, you only focused on points I added in specific to Waglington's case. Let me copy paste it for you:

" By the time the chat mod OR rollback request is brought up, said user will already have had voting power for some time."

Such promotions involve those who already have already had voting powers. They've already been tested on the SSC and have proved they're not a seedling.

On a side note, adding the hostile tone at the end does nothing to help your case and does not phase me in the slightest. It wasn't intended to be taken as hostile, it was intended to put emphasis on the fact that not allowing the community to express their desires will result in people getting upset. And since when has anybody ever gotten SSC voting powers without being a rollback or chat mod?