Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-4266719-20140128102136/@comment-4093783-20140128210253

John Breasly wrote: YES YES YES

Staff can't sit on the sides. You're staff because you have to make the tough decisions that not everyone will like. If you're like Goldvane, voting neutral on EVERY OTHER VOTE, you are contributing NOTHING to the wiki and should be demoted. Notice how no one went to Goldvane for administrative issues? I mean sure they did, after people approached like every other admin.

Government officials don't get to "stay out of things." Reddits admins don't leave the "hard decisions" to others. The only successful things in the world are made by people making the tough decisions.

I'm tired of a useless administration who sits on a fence and declines anything that requires them to put in any effort (as we see with NULTS and PARAX above).

I don't think I ever voted neutral as an admin. Not everyone liked me, but I was actually an efficient admin (Tama being the other). Why? Because we didn't sit on the fence, we got things done. That's why the wiki thrived under people like us and died under this new attitude of admins that they're immune and even entitled to do whatever they want.

We need admins that don't sit on fences. The best leaders pick sides. That's why our president is so unproductive. He sits on the fence. He shakes hands one minute and threatens others the next. He's afraid to make a call. You know who made the tough decisions? People like Julius Caesar. People who actually founded something. People who do more than talk.

Stop talking. Stop being politically correct. Stop hiding behind a grey button. Do your job, or resign.

I was unaware that voting neutral once or twice every so often (while picking sides most of the time) somehow means that we always go neutral.