Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-4266719-20140706182925/@comment-3112181-20140707173625

"I know I said I wasn't going to argue but I just have to clarify something really quick."

So, arguing.

"Where in my post did I suggest unbanning him? Don't group me in with all the radical extremists just because I have a Spanish flag as my avatar and happen to speak out against badmouthing users who are already banned and can therefore not come to speak for themselves."

What many of you Spaniards don't seem to understand (yes, I'm calling you a Spaniard, as your avatar is a Spanish flag. Am I grouping? Maybe. Am I discriminating? No.) is that Pearson not being able to speak for himself on this wiki is kind of the whole purpose of his infinite ban. I mean, it's really noble and honestly quite touching of you to come here and stand up for your buddy, but it isn't necessary. He isn't going to be unbanned anytime soon, thus the infinite in the phrase "infinite ban". Perhaps nowhere in your previous post did you outright support unbanning Pearson, but Ben, we all know why you're here. You don't edit the wiki for a hot second but the minute an "unban Pearson" thread pops up you're all over it. If you didn't come here to argue as you claim, you're here to see Pearson unbanned.

"I'm sure he was banned for a good reason, and I'm even more sure that you weren't present when that happened so stop speaking as if you were."

Correct! He was banned for a good reason. 10 points to Slytherin. Also, roughly 90% of the wiki's populace is made up of veteran users, so roughly 90% of the users here have witnessed Pearson's banning. Victoria included.

"@Mallace, this has nothing to do with free speech. If you want to bash people, do it privately in chat. Don't make it public for everyone to see. You're literally inviting havoc. It's not cute or amusing. Find something better to do and let it go."

Where does he bash Pearson? Maybe he thought Pearson really did go through rehab, etc, as that was his understanding from what somebody might have told him. Now, if he were to say "PEARSON IS A STUPID FREAKY DRUG ADDICT WHALE MAMMOTH JR!!!1!!11one!!!" then yes, that'd be bashing and would warrant action.

"Also, for the record, Pearson doesn't know how to hack so stop trying to use that to put a scar on his reputation. He never did hack. People would have issues with their computers and accuse him of being the cause of it and he'd take credit for it so that people wouldn't mess with him. Anyone who hasn't figured that out yet is pretty stupid. Lol. NOW, I'm done having comment wars. Didly-da! <3"

lmao ikr