Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-7922376-20131223032848/@comment-4934912-20131223043623

Gman, Despite the lack of reasonings from the opposition, you've switched your vote. I can only conclude that an indiscrete group conversation which proabbly involved some under-the-table dealings and/or threats/promises has made you decide to change your position in this vote. His "one chance", as you call it, was taken from him last time simply because he didn't complete a blog within the alotted time line. I'm not sure how that's "wasting" a chance seeing as that blog received more comments than any blog has received here in roughly half a year.

That all being said, I strongly advise that you reconsider what side you're supporting here before you blatantly disregard all of the evidence supporting Pearson's cause.