User blog comment:John Breasly/Questioning the "System of Roleplay" Established Here/@comment-2084412-20121230030023

I agree that roleplay needs to be more in-game based, but I do not understand why this is being made a big deal. Roleplayers get upset when other people try to start a roleplay country. It's a fan-created system of player vs player and pretending to follow a nation from the 1700s, why debate over it to this extent? You may reply that "the system has been ruined, omg, do you not understand what's at stake here? omg! etc", and if so, you are only proving my point further. We really shouldn't turn this into a huge debate. If you really care about the roleplay experience I suggest you get on the game and start promoting it, not debate about it on a Wiki blog. If you don't like the way roleplay is here, either talk with people in a mature way about changing it or just don't participate in it. This is John's opinion, and he has the right to post it, but it really makes us look silly to sit here and make it seem like a huge issue. All the accusations going around, and the arguing, all I say is ugh. It is pointless.

Also, I do not wish to become majorly involved in this, as Pistola said below, but I must point one thing out. "but we've become so enveloped in our little community that we disallow others from establishing a home here," This is an excellent point, but I also see that Nults McKagan has been attacked in several ways here, such as referring to his roleplay group as "crap" and calling him a kid who "can't support a rp country" is seemingly a rude thing to say to a new user, and though he's not a brand new editor here, he is moderately, and that is not the kind of attitude that I think will encourage new users to join the RP system.

You're all bickering like monkies over something so small in your lives..... you will look back one day and laugh, I'd bet $100 xD