Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-4093783-20140303211229

Mallace recently proposed a rule that would make it illegal for the wiki's staff to vote neutral on Seven Seas Court proposals. However, he overlooked adding a provision that Staffers can't vote neutral on Community Votes as well. Mallace even called out an admin on Jeremiah Garland's promotion Community Vote for voting neutral, but since his request technically doesn't cover Community Votes no rules were being broken by the admin in question.

Mallace mentioned that a provision to ban Staffers voting neutral on Community Votes could be added at a later date, though. My question is: '''why can't that "later" be now? '''

Rollbacks and Chat Mods, such as myself, don't exactly have the world on their shoulders in terms of work on the wiki right now, so it would give them some reason to have their positions and give us a reason for wanting them there.

Admins and Bureacrat(s) were put into the positions that they were because they're expected to keep the site in order and make important decisions to push us further. Although one could technically argue that an Admin/Bureacrat's only job is enforcing rules because they were entrusted with "a few extra buttons," a wiki can't exactly thrive if the people running it are apathetic in other ways.

Thank you for reading.

 