Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-4266719-20140930224117

It's become apparent here that the biggest rule broken isn't drama caused by the EITC demotion of Lord General Overseer Admiral Lenny. Instead, the biggest problem that both myself, my superiors, my peers and users have reported to me is agression. Pushing arguing a bit too far.

We all know that our Ego's on this wiki are huge. If someone says something we disagree we, we do naturally have the right to counter them. That sparks discussion.

But lately, discussion borders (and usually crosses) heavy debate, leaving users in humiliation and upset. Those users usually will later retaliate in someway, whether it be attacking the user or the administration for "failing to do their job."

So, I propose on behalf of a NUMBER of users, that we grant less leniency towards debate and arguing. This means a heavier crackdown that will hopefully lead to less people getting kicked upset (via more people getting kicked, in the beginning). It does define the term "arguement" as vague, however, it is usually very clear once the line has been crossed. If you ever have a problem with a kick/ban, please contact any member of the administration.

The intent of this is to ease agression amongst the community and hopefully, open the door for more users. The leniency for allowing such arguements to continue must end.

Respectfully,

 