User blog comment:Lord Andrew Mallace/Demotion Request: G-man./@comment-25164591-20160505005543

I am deeply troubled by the fact that ~88% (and counting) of users who oppose G-man's demotion are either:

1. A current or former staff member

2. An inactive user who conveniently only came back to the wiki to vote on this one motion (almost as if they were specifically asked to come here to do just that)

Even those who genuinely believe that G is eligible to run the wiki must realize this is an insult to democracy. What does it say about someone's administration when an overwhelming majority of active, dedicated users, the actual consistent contributors, the common people, feel something must change, but their voices are being silenced through dishonest methods that shouldn't even be allowed?