User blog comment:Parax./Community Vote: Prince Leon of England/@comment-3359524-20130104162851/@comment-4879311-20130104182440

We want a voice, but not with drama like this. And I think there is a better way to hear others opinions, for example PMing users. The drama created on this blog with close to 200 comments is too much. If you looked at all of activity, there is only once are twice, maybe three times I spot a page thats not this blog. To me it is really pizzling what's not there to get about how we can't oppose like this. There is no where in the rules that defines what is a valid Oppose reason and a valid Support reason. It only defines "I'm his friend Oppose" or "He just needs to be Suppport" as invalid reasons.

And we are telling you how to interpert our vote. Why do we have to be attacked for our reasons? And I am going to agree with Garland that we should probably have a second vote on a temporary ban. No where in the rules says how we should vote and why. We have our reasons, and shouldn't be attacked or whatever it is you want to call it. To be safe let's just call it questioning our opinions. We should be able to give our vote and valid opinion. Finished.

I think he should be banned because ________

He shouldn't be because ________

Should be how it looks

I feel like I can't have the freedom to just have my own little opinion. It's a vote. Done. The second I agreed with Sharple and others, we started getting questioned why. I have my opinion and shouldn't be questioned, that's why there is almost 200 Comments because then we have to defend ourselves and justify our position. We shouldn't have to. The way we changed our votes was we saw another's vote and tada we decided that it made more sense. Not questioning users.