Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-3112181-20140206040123/@comment-4879311-20140206215942

WHAT IS THE POINT of SSC if we BAN ITS ENTIRE PURPOSE: For users & staffers to discuss proposals to the site. We defeat the very PURPOSE OF THIS BOARD AND WHAT WE EVEN LIVE FOR. All I see right now is an Administrative Power grab from users so they may oust anyone they find opposing them taking on a dcotorine of a dictatorship and pursuing the route of destroying what makes this entire community unique to the rest of the Wikia network. To completely kill off SSC's purpose is exactly like killing off Role-Play here even though the game is gone. It is as if we all decided "oh game is gone lets try to be a different people cause we cool like that". We are not going to get anywhere at all with this type of attitude. Any person that honestly supports these new measures is off their rocker and needs to be re-evaluated as a staffer and their job as one. Frankly all I see is a power grab and those staffers must have some nerve to believe that just because the game went that they can go ahead and not only take back rightful control they should have but then some. It is as if they believe they must be dictators of the world because they have been ran over and over and over. By passing this measure not only will this kill off an entire population of users I bet you this for sure, but it will just progress this site's death and will completely plunge it into the depths unlike ever seen before, it can easily be true within a night, overnight death. "Many users without rank who disagree with votes submitted have the tendency to argue on the thread, ruining the purpose and resulting in drama." This would not even be a problem if the administration would actually stop slacking off and did their job in punishing users, and rollbacks as well seeing as they do in fact have justification to issue warnings on Forums by a measure I myself proposed and was passed long ago. If not only the admins but the rollbacks did not slack off on their responsibilities this would not be a rpoblem, furthermore I believe what is characterized as "arguing" is mere debate, but because you may be on the opposite voting side, you find it a threat to your side's possibility of winning over in a request. This is not what we are here for. This is not who we are. This not who we should be. This is extremisim. This is bias. This is the very definition of corruption. THIS IS THE DEATH. We were once easily seen as a site that was not just a community but a family that had its times of disagreements but that could live together in harmony. Here I stand today retracting such a claim I have made as this is no longer a site that is a family but a mere political battle ground for power of a group's vision and power over users. And supporting this measure only further supports the destruction of how this community is unique to many other wikis in the Wikia network, it destroys our very identity as a people. This is one of the few things that makes this site who we are. The SSC being deprived of opinions of those without rights not only defeats the purpose but only, if anything, causes more pre-vote drama. It will only be a bigger "battle"/"argument" on the Community Votes and it will completely tear this entire community apart. Turmoil is what this supports. Chaos is what this supports. Death, is what this supports. We are a people, a community, and not an entire nation and dictatorship to be ruled over by those with rights where only those with rights may invite those they find loyal to them to help their cause. This is a small town community where everyone shares their opinion, and each one to be valued and viewed before a large official vote is made. Depriving SSC of its original purpose: Users without rights voicing their opinions, would just make this very board spam and not worthy of recognition.

We are a small town community, not a dictatorship. We are a people that should communicate, and we can not block the other out because we disagree with them. This only rpomotes tension between this community and what it was founded upon after it took off. I do not believe this is what our Founder would have wanted to see, and the sad thing is he can so choose to see it die and is not dead himself. We are destroying an establishment that has changed people's lives despite how pitiful it may even sound. It is just as bad as Disney closing POTCO. This is what this is. This, is what this is.


 * 1) deletedispost