User blog comment:Jarod Pillagebane/Chat Rule Request: No Edits, No Service - Rewritten (& Ban Requests: Raven Potter, EmilyDarkvane, AngelDarkvane)/@comment-5169038-20120409150229/@comment-4034967-20120409222524

I crossed it out because it was a joke. ..

Jack, it is a privilege if we wanted we could just turn it off and it'd be gonel

I'm sick and tired of unappreciative users abusing chat like it's just some kind of right that they have. It is a privilege, and should be earned. 100 edits, half of which can be comments, are notmjard to make. Only 50 edits must be mainspace, and if you can't make that many, you are downright lazy.

Stop trying to throw me under the bus, it's not because she's "annoying," it's because she's underaged, makes no productive edits, and abuses this wiki's chat.

I am tired of all the new users that think they know what they're talking about when they honestly have no clue whatsoever. Our chat feature has been hugely abused. It is a privilege, not a right, and like all privileges, it can be taken away.

Some users come on it simply to talk, and stay on it all day. Well, that is not the purpose of chat. The purpose of chat is to contact someone for coding help, to get opinions on community votes, and to take part in discussions, not to sit around all day and talk about random junk with your BFFs. The fact that they use it to talk about a subject there is already a wiki for is just ridiculous.

I didn't ban John, I didn't kickban him, I wasn't even part of that bloody situation! Here's a thought: If she feels left out, then she can talk somewhere else, like the game for heavens' sake. If I were making this up, would I have written all that? Would I have linked that video? Honestly, I'm getting tired of you and your smart mouth, Goldwrecker.

Do you really think, if I hadn't thought about it, I'd write all that? Create this bloody blog?

When a crime is commited, the interrogators don't take the suspect out for coffee and ask them their feelings, they get the job done,

If a guy robs a bank, and gets caught, he doesn't send a guy to say they did it when there's clear evidence, like surveillance, to back up the fact that the original suspect robbed the bank. That guy gets caught and is punished, and the other guy is punished also for lying to the police and basically being the first guy's puppet. See how that relates to this?

I am honestly tired of all this illogical reasoning andnpeople not reading the blog. Do you seriously think I'm making this up?