Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-4934912-20131210223143/@comment-4934912-20131212042107

While I didn't create this blog to have Pearson unbanned, Jeffrey makes several very good points:

1.) Several people (Spaniards), who had done absolutely nothing wrong, and came here because Pearson was trying to put Spanish influence on the Wiki to prevent a complete British-takeover were banned for literally no reason. I am a perfect example of this abuse. Just check my banlog. I got a 2 year ban because 1 person suspected that me and Pearson used the same POTCO account, even though I'd quit POTCO over half a year before I'd even joined the wiki.

2.) Jeffrey is also right about the fact that had you not gone on a rampage and banned Pearson for literally, no reason, none of this would be happening. Although, even before you had banned him, I never fully agreed with Garland becoming an administrator.

Furthermore, Garland, if you truly think that Pearson as an individual has done anything worse on here than John, or even you for that matter have done, then you're kidding yourself. Ok, he's infinitely banned. We understand how passionate you are about keeping this an Anti-Pearson playzone, that's great, but don't over exaggerate the problem at hand. He didn't do anything completely out of proportion, so you can stop talking behind his back now. I would greatly appreciate that seeing as he is my friend, and I do not appreciate you badmouthing people who are banned and powerless to respond to what you are saying. Ironically, even when he wasn't banned, he was powerless to respond, because you deleted 90% of his replies because you didn't want anyone to consider his point of view.