User blog comment:Sir Joseph Grey/Proposals for Reformation/@comment-3112181-20140102175154/@comment-4879311-20140102180815

I kind of disagree here with there being a set limit on these things when we are attempting to revive a place and would like to be prepared in the case of rising number of users and activity on this site. Not only that but just one bureaucrat may not suffice if there were a set limit in my opinion. What if the standing Bur is unable to access the wiki? What if the standing Bur decides not care? (Not saying Par would but just in general in the future in the case that Par resgins, dont know if that will be anytime soon though) What if the standing Bur suddenly goes missing? Then what? "well you have somany rollbacks and-" Allow me to stop you there for a second. knowing this site's history of Rollbacks and Chat Moderators, they go out the door in a flash lately. So to be reasonable let us say it drops down to what it did with the Bur leaving 2 Admins & 1 ChatMod/Roll. That aint getting you very far when there maybe a necessity to promote others and decide on things. a 3 Vote State is not necessarily ideal in our case nor something that should happen. 3 Votes means the 2 Admins can agree on anything or one admin and one roll. Disagreemnt time? There is too many negative outcomes that would come from  an inactive Bur in the future and  our sad history of how inactive rollbacks & chatmods become.