User blog comment:Jeremiah Garland/Really, Jack?/@comment-4266719-20121008064537

Ah, Countpr! So WONDERFUL to have you back, as our last encounter was just so brilliant and productive. I am here to yet again counter you rather immature point of view. And I say that for the following reasons.

You JUST LOVE to jump into conversations of which you have NO IDEA about don't you?

If you read the rules, my friend, you would see, and I paraphrase, not directly "No harrasment." As you were not here to See goldwrecker commit the acts you can claim no authority in this conversation. He "forced" users to "obey" god. We are not revoking his right to the 1st amendment, which even itself implies Free speech to the point of negative affect on the public, which we are going at. WE are not saying he cannot talk about religion, if you properly read the blog, we (meaning Jeremian I suppose) are asking jack to ditch the commanding tone. He can talk about the Lord all he wants, but imposing the fact that we need to follow it is not right, Your glorius first amendment actually blocks that to. "Freedom of Free Religious Excersize." The Pilgrims who set forth on these lands seeked religious freedom, and Jack in a way is denying some users of that. I am sooo.. SOOO glad you decided to come back, and cannot way to personally rebut everyone of your improbable posts.

"We live in a world that is more and more tolerant and accepting of the ideals of religious freedom and the freedom of speech."

YA DON'T SAY?!