User blog:Lord Marshal Samuel Harrington/Perfect Wiki "Government"

OK, this would be a good idea for a "government" for our community. My idea fairly divides the power, while using ideas from many comments I have read on Captain Crimson's blog. Please, enjoy.

Our Wiki Government
LIke John Breasly said, we could do votes based on user ranks. The higher your user rank, the more important votes you can take part in. If you have a low user rank, you can only vote on less important things. The ADMINS would have to come up with the chart. As I requested to Jack Pistol, instead of making user unable to make ban requests, I propose a newer, better system. We let users go to ADMINS, and ADMINS only, so they're not going to ALL Burs, Rollbacks, and what not, and let them request to the ADMIN the banning of a user, but they must provide a legitimate reason, and give evidence. The ADMIN will from that point review the request and decide whether it is legitimate or not. If it is, the ADMIN will make the ban request blog, but will put "REQUESTED FROM USER:LORD MARSHAL SAMUEL HARRIGTON" (Example name) as to not cause any mix-ups. As for ADMINS having power, they need to step up, and take action for themselves. It's not our fault their letting the users walk all over them. To all you Sysops out there, don't be afraid to give out bans and strieks to those seriously acting up. Another Idea. As my dear frined Jack Swordmenace (Countpr) suggested, we automatically ban those who vandalize, or say extremely vulgar words such as the F-word and any racial slurs, or any other serious offenses commited. For those who did not commit such a bad crime, we have this new idea: Communty Vote Ban. This is where the community votes whether to have the user banned or not. All users would be able to vote on this, as it would be a community vote. That is pretty much all. Stay tuned for more though, as I may add more ideas as I think of them.