Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-4093783-20140303211229/@comment-4879311-20140305204129

Parax. wrote:

Reyes De Luz (Albert Spark) wrote: Frankly neutrality should not nor ever should be an option for any staffer or person on this site that has a vote on the administrative panel and SSC. We can not just not be able to make up our minds on things that must be passed to continue moving forward. You were promoted to make certain decisions for users and not just kill off the vandalisers' dreams.It is part the staffers duty to be able to make decisions not just on SSC but on Community Votes as well... If we have an unsure administration and staff, we don't have people who look out for this site's well being nor future and only are worsening a possible unnecessary death to a site because they can not decide how to further progress it. There is still so much that this Administration can be doing and should be doing but instead a large majority (not everyone) does very little to help this site. The same can be said for non-admins. If their votes affect a community vote, why should only rollbacks+ be targeted?

rollbacks+ are expected to make many large decisions for this site unlike regular users and sitting around like its just a title adoes not do squat, nor is not being decisive.

On another note, kudos to Breasly.