User blog:James Macstealer/I Seem To Have A Problem

I was on chat, minding my own business, when the top of intercourse came up. Somebody referenced it to sex, and I immediately defined intercourse for them, as a process that is done together, by two people. Then sexual intercourse was brought up, and I defined that as human reproduction via inserting the male penis inside of the female vagina. Now I ask... What is wrong with anything I said? For you people out there who don't know the world of science, the words penis and vagina, when used in proper context, are scientific words and are therefore not classified as vulgar. If you don't believe me, I invite you to look it up. I was, after defining sexual intercourse, kicked from chat without a warning or strike. I find this to be extremely unfair, when I was defining a human process, a topic of biology, which everybody will take in highschool. Now I ask how any of this was innapropriate, considering the partiuclar context I used it in was a scientific definition, and therefore not vulgar, so, I do believe I was unfairly kicked. I don't like seeing this, and I have now lost a lot of respect for this wiki. I believe that a lot of you don't really understand that difference between innapropriate and scientific. How can you ban me for defining how each and every one of us was made? By your logic, you MUST ban talking about cell reproduction (the process by which a cell splits) from the wiki, as it is speaking about sexual intercourse. It is the same process, but is carried out a little differently. If you don't see this as an innapropriate topic, then human reproduction, which is not much different, isn't innapropriate either, so long as the context it is used in stays scientific. So, if you don't ban talking about that, then you can't ban talking about sexual intercourse. You either ban all sexual references, or none, but you can't choose to ban some of them.