Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4934912-20140115031312/@comment-4934912-20140115033656

1.) The fine line between fact and fiction was drawn after I uploaded these screenshots. These are no longer rumors. They're facts. Facts are stubborn things, but they exist. You're going to have to accept it sooner or later, regardless of how hard you try and defend a known hacker who for some precarious reason you think should remain as an administrator here.

2.) I'm sure. Great cover up.

3.) I requested his demotion upon the requests which I received from 3 other users, all begging me to make this request. As pointed out, this is not something I intended to post myself.

4.) You've said this in all of your previous points. You could have just made 1 point instead of 5 separate repetitive ones.

5.) The reason they opposed is due to the fact that people suspected Pearson of having Redskull's account. Before that incident, it was on the verge of passing.

These assumptions have existed for well over a year now. They're now justified with ample evidence, and therefore, this user needs to be banned immediately. I will be contacting Wiki Staff if no action is taken as I'm quite sure "hacking" is against the TOU. I could be wrong though. It's bothersome to me that you're defending a known hacker, and that you're so in support of having a hacker, slanderer, and impersonater, and potential vandalist remain as an administrator on this wiki.

You should strongly reconsider your vote, although, I'm pretty sure you won't considering as how the only reason you casted it in said direction is because he's your friend; not because you want what's best for the community in this particular instance.

~ The Pope