User blog comment:Reyes De Luz (Albert Spark)/Demotion Request:Captaingoldvane2/@comment-3503368-20131227062435

I would like to call out your frail inactivity argument using this: In order to ensure that most, if not all, staff members on The POTC Fanon Wiki are active participants in the community, The POTC Fanon Wiki needs to adopt an Inactive Staff Policy. The policy came from the Sims Wiki. Any inactive staff member breaking this policy will be punished accordingly to their actions. The policy is as follows:
 * A staff member is inactive when they do not make a non-minor (examples of minor edits: fixing spelling, participating in discussions unrelated to Pirates Online or The POTCO Players Wiki, editing their userpage) or staff-related (staff-related tasks, not necessarily tasks only staff members can do) contribution within one (1) month.
 * Staff members will be given a reminder after one month of inactivity, before their rights are to be revoked. (Current inactive admins will also receive a warning if the policy goes into effect.)
 * Staff members will be given a reminder after one month of inactivity, then another a week after their first reminder, before their rights are to be revoked.

Notices
Thanks!
 * Staff Members must be consistently active and not have spotted activity, or they will also be considered inactive.For a History of Notices please see Pirates Online Players Wiki:Inactive Sysop Policy/LogPlease use the following Templates
 * -for the first Notice
 * -for 1 week after the first Notice

First off: he HAS contributed within the past month; upon a simple contribution check, he voted December 11th on a SSC request. Jer's thing. Check it.

Second off: even if he hadn't, you neglected to give him two notices. Um?

Third off: there isn't much activity in PPW now, anyway, and certainly not vandalisms to rollback. Is he really trying to spur activity? No; however, as per YOUR POLICY, he is not inactive and that cannot and should not be used as a valid reason for his demotion.

Oh, and before someone accuses me of simply defending him because I'm dating him, I'd like you to take a look at my above argument and refute it; otherwise I'm simply not going to respond. If you like, though, I'll point out the juicy fact that the majority of current supports on this blog have conspicuous beef with Goldy, as is exemplified in David's comment.

Merry Christmas.