Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-4093783-20140720213424/@comment-4879311-20140720234847

Skeptical of this proposal to be honest. If we were to change into this direction then I wonder how would we be structured in terms of pages for other games. "But Al it is all rather simple, we just start typing up a page about X for game Y, end of story c:" Yes but what you may not have taken into consideration is how the wiki in its current state is structured for a E-10 + game, not even for the franchise of POTC we currently stand for, that being said some games we may find to be somewhat objectionable and to further elaborate on this point I will use The Elder Scrolls ("You have not even played this game you asshat") franchise as an example. Seeing as some of it's more recent games are rated for those above the (Al pls) mature age of 17  (TESO & TES V: Skyrim) anything allowed within the Wikia ToU is fine from these games but based off the way we are currently structured (geared toward E-10+) we can't possibly be serious in allowing this content. One of the following things would have to be in place in order to determine how we are going to go about this...

If this were completely approved, Admins & Community passed then we would also want to take into consideration the following as well: Based off the current dedication of this administration with the exception of a select few, this has to be done right, or there will be mass chaos! It is a large reason that makes me skeptical and I would like to see assurance that the following can be done, and not in a sloppy matter, done by dedicated beings who would like to see this place not sink to the depths but rise above possibly back to the olden days. There are various concerns to take into account that aren't ones that we can just go "oh no big deal Al, this is nothing" because I will put my own money on it that if it is not taken care of correctly, people will start finding loopholes that aren't really loopholes because of the precautions that were not taken. This has to to be handled delicately or else we are bound to failed. We have to add on reforms and new policies before we go all "OMG    TOTES MCGOTES MY BOATS BEST IDEA OF THE CENTURY #YUS #NOTHETITANICANYMORE ". I find myself neutral for the time being. (And the templates are being used in a sense of not voting but what might be said on the Community Vote pls no h8 c:)
 * A - Game Approval Council/System - Essentially we would, before allowing a user to add x fictitious content about y game to make page z we would run the game through a voting system or a council of selected "concerned" and "devoted" members or the Administration itself.
 * B - Reforms - Simple and to the point. If we are going to allow any given game then.... just make it to where various things not allowed by our current rules be allowed (swearing or thing within Wikia ToU). The end.
 * Will we redo the theme of this place (to the extent that we don't lose our original identity?)
 * If we are being more inclusive and to stay relevant, will we be changing the name for a second time?
 * Do some of the current policies need to be thrown out in order to incorporate more games into the site instead of limiting it to the point to where this is not even worth it?
 * Do some policies need to be put into place in order to incorporate more games into the site so that there is not extreme chaos that may occuer due to the lack of policies or extreme vagueness in our policy?