Board Thread:1 Admin Seal of Approval/@comment-1279322-20160511201623/@comment-3432656-20160511205303

Voxelplox wrote: Johnny Goldtimbers is on my side

"People who have thousands of edits on this wiki should be allowed to vote, but nah, they don't come here anymore. They're illegal immigrants" - from the demotion blog

I think if Parax gets to vote, then surely I do to?

I would make another topic - so apologies, but it seems that this thread has become a discussion so since this is related I believe it should in this thread. That was my opinion and I still stand by it, but I have an obligation to enforce the rules.

'2.) We acknowledge that certain users are active in chat but don't edit very much; people like Viceroy Robert McRoberts, Jim Logan and (more recently) Haras come to mind. I propose that these people be allowed to appeal for an exempting from the first article of this bill on the 1ASA board. If an admin determines that they're active enough on the wiki without editing, they may be given voting rights. However, they will be closely monitored and if their activity on chat declines their voting rights will be revoked. If this clause ends up being abused or not properly enforced, I'll probably propose something alternative for people like Rob and Jim (or I might anyways regardless, I don't know yet).'

Parax hasn't been the most active, but there is no comparison between him and yourself. As said, you haven't even been seen or heard from in over a year. Seeing the circumstances, I'd allow Parax to have the voting right, but again that is my personal opinion.