Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-4093783-20140303211229/@comment-1279322-20140305193910

Lord Andrew Mallace wrote: Parax. wrote: for now. Admins/mods/rollbacks are users trusted to handle few extra buttons and to keep order on a wiki, not to have their voting rights—no matter how much people may not like them—to be slowly whittled away.

Oyah, and I don't know why they should be forced to have to do this on a community vote when it takes their approval to make it one in the first place. It's a vote for the community, so why not let them all—admins, burs, mods, rollbacks, and people without those rights—express themselves how they truly feel on the vote, rather than stripping them of that. True, they can always vote later when they make up their minds, but if that's the case, then I expect this to spread to all users (considering that everyone has a say in a community vote and thus affects it), rather than just targeting rollbacks+.

We're expected to keep the wiki in check, not act like the government of a first world country. ._.

but becuz ouur vote dos not count on ze SCC regardless of ze community votes, you have created a government-acting force. And I base my opinions on supporting or opposing a candidate heavily on their voting rights. Considering basically everyone is qualified, itz time to do wats right for the progressive party.

I'm not for de-centralization in the sense of less admins, i'm for de-centralization in the sense of more user rights.

How do rollbacks+ not voting on a community vote grant more rights to users? If anything, it's taking them away from a specific group of people here.