User blog comment:Lord Andrew Mallace/Demotion Request: G-man./@comment-3432656-20160504152430

G-man's previous demotions were made from what I can infer are the following reasons;

1 Hector Wildhayes claiming that G-man 'hacked' my Skype (Completely unrelated to his behaviour on the wiki).

2 G-man taking a holiday because of life, and there was very little activity on the wiki at that time.

3 G-man being a temporary-President-appointed-admin instead of one elected by the community.

4 G-man refusing to promote people to chat mods/rollbacks as there was no need for them at the time.

Four demotion requests without any good reasons, any incriminating evidence, just the fact that the user at the time who made the request had an agenda against him. That's fine. We all have agendas against each other, you just need to give some good reasons for us to demote the man who added all your chat emotes, verbatims, and other code related items on the wiki. Every single demotion request is a joke to G-man.

If you kept getting arrested for looking like a suspected murderer or criminal, and then being let off with an insincere apology over and over again, wouldn't you laugh at the fifth time being arrested?

The claim that all he does is sit in chat, isn't true. Why don't you take a look at his contributions and then tell me that all he does is sit in chat.

'He has no motivation to change things or generate the (according to him, although it is true) all-important activity.'

Why don't you look at the Seven Seas Court, 1 Admin Seal of Approval, and then say that again. G-man has been very progressive and thoughtful for the wiki's future. If he didn't care, he would bother. He wouldn't login everyday and sit in chat. He wouldn't edit the wiki. He'd just dominate over everyone's activity and shoot down every liberal idea. He'd build a massive wall. I don't see any walls. I see bridges. I see progress.

You're all immature. I hope you realise that. Next time everyone's in chat, I'll make sure to point that out. You want to see an awakening? I'll be sure you feel it.

You wouldn't have promoted G-man if he wasn't like you, or didn't share your same beliefs. You promoted one of your own. So, please tell me which one of you would be considered a 'model user' of the wiki? We all have our strengths, and weaknesses. The administration of the wiki is less immature, hence why they were chosen/elected to govern this wiki. If that isn't a 'model user' by our standards, I do not know what your parameters are in regards to that matter.

I humbly as once again, this is a request that lacks a single good reason to remove G-man. from his current position when compared to the rest of the community.