User blog comment:Jeremiah Garland/My Views on Various Issues/@comment-3242795-20130311200333

" The problem our wiki has, as has been stated before, is not Pearson or some outside force; it is ourselves."

"There are several explanations. My theory is Pearson Wright."

Wat.

As for the admins, they're promoting their buddies. Are you blind? And by the way, the "golden age" you claim was when users could make ban/demote blogs.

"We held a vote. A vote that passed. You can't get any more democratic than that."

We held an inconclusive vote with a near 50/50 split. That is not "a passed vote." There needs to be rules concerning a majority. And I know there were, but I also know of several admins who edit the rules page to work to their advantage, two of which were recently demoted.

It clearly wasn't a fairly well-decided winner, not to mention that a split like that will cause mass fighting. The only sensible action would be to keep him as a regular user to hold off the "drama," but unfortunately Parax and Goldvane are fans of patronage.