Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-3112181-20170507140453/@comment-3443450-20170508014913

Jeremiah Garland wrote: You're absolutely right Par, it is a case of "this person said this vs that person said that".

Especially considering how no reasons have ever been recorded for his ban(s), nor is there any proof on this site or any other of him "sexually harassing" anyone.

As someone who was also in the middle of it and involved, it's not only libellous but also quite offensive to the memory of my friend that you'd call him a "sexual predator" with nothing to go on but mere hearsay. This thread is to decide whether Josh should be unbanned or not, while talking about why he was banned is something that should be happening you shouldn't just be going back and forth with Par over emotional reasons like "offensive to the memory" and the like. So unless anyone has proof of anything regarding this let's just stop with this back and forth and keep the personal feelings out of this thread k?