User blog comment:Reyes De Luz (Albert Spark)/Demotion Request:Captaingoldvane2/@comment-4934912-20131227184422

R.E. Garland - Just because there's two other inactive rollbacks/admins (who were demoted), doesn't give Goldvane an excuse to be inactive as well.

Before I took a stance here, I had a good hour long conversation with Goldvane last night and asked him why he wanted to remain as a rollback. He couldn't answer me. All he did was deflect. All he said was: "Because I've been here a long time". That isn't a valid reason, nor a substantial qualification.

My vote is not targeted against Goldvane as an individual, but against all inactive administrators or mods or rollbacks who think that they deserve to keep their positions despite contributing nothing to the wiki whatsoever. What Goldvane does, is do the bare minimum just to have a vote; which is exactly what he told me last night when I asked him why he wanted to remain a rollback. He responded: "Because I like having a vote." This third grade response doesn't merit the privileges and responsibilities that he has been entrusted with. Having said all that, I support this demotion.