Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-4879311-20140711182208/@comment-4879311-20140711184051

1.) Pearson (who is said to be blacklisted) did not have a community vote to be blocked. He was blocked for not completing a blog on time. If this is how the blacklist is going to work, ex past facto would make Pearson's ban void. 

This isn't even about Pearson. It's about anyone who should belong the list. It's not singling out anyone. It's so tiring to have you guys saying "Oh you just hate Pearson" on here. Can we move on? I'm sorry but despite my belief that he should be unbanned I am so tired of hearing this narrative a million times over. Secondly, Ex Post Facto does not even apply here. Ask John Breasly who CREATED IT if I am not mistaken.

2.) Before this goes into effect, those who did not commit great offense, such as George Sailward and particularly Bella need to be unbanned. They shouldn't be blacklisted. I see no substantial evidence that shows that Bella did any great harm in any way towards this community.

Hence why I proposed that reasons as to why they were banned for such an expanse be given with their name on the Blacklist.