User blog comment:Voxelplox/A few ideas/@comment-3432656-20140923002618/@comment-3432656-20140925193147

"Johnny your being critical on me for no reason." Correction: I am providing constructive feedback to express my opinion of your ideas.

Find me a renewable resource then (a specific game title). The aspect of a realistic community is "sharing common attitudes, interests, and goals". This wiki had/has one common interest and that was/has been POTCO. POTCO was one game and one specific topic. I have observed that most wikis geared toward the nebulous topic of "gaming" (concerning more than one game or game series) have all but one characteristic in common. They are all informational wikis that provide tutorials, walk throughs, hints, and above all, encyclopaedias concerning a lot of games and their content. Now you may find on occasion; the player's imaginative story about their character or style of gaming, but there is hardly the case to which deals with the motif of "fanon". Most of the games approved already are console games (singleplayer or limited multiplayer) and do not allow a wide variety of customisation.

Then again, the games we would look for would be massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGs). Not once have I found a prosperous wiki, blog, website, etc that incorporated user-written fanon on a massive scale as seen here or other wikis that only have one game geared toward their community characteristic of a "shared interest".

That is my opinion on why creating a "gaming fanon" wiki will not have a favourable outcome to our liking.

Good day, sir.