User blog comment:Lord Andrew Mallace/Demotion Request: G-man./@comment-25164591-20160505005543/@comment-25164591-20160505014945

You've been asked to stop the flaming at least once already on this blog alone, so I'd appreciate it if you actually made an effort to form a counterargument as opposed to trying to make me look dumb.

It seems you keep resorting back to that classic argument of "well, this person is trying to make a change to the administration, so they must be power hungry/forming a coup/literally Hitler." While you're certainly entitled to speculate on our motivations all you want, we've been completely transparent thus far regarding our plans.

The point I was trying to make is that literally every active, non-staff user here bar one supports G's demotion, and yet the odds of the demotion becoming a reality are narrowing by the hour; this isn't because the community as a whole wants him to remain president, it's because the tiny few who want him to remain president are resorting to desperate methods (ie, bringing a brigade of inactive users back for the sole purpose of opposing the motion) to maintain the lead.

Par, I especially expected more from you than petty name-calling (I see you in activity m8) considering you were the president of this wiki literally less than a year ago at this point and up until recent months you've practically been the model of what an authority figure should be.

That goes for Ned, Goldvane, and anyone else who's taken this a little too personally as well. Take a chill pill, be respectful, and make an attempt to consider other people's viewpoint.

I understand where both of you are coming from. But this was never about seizing power and never will be. Our intention is to make Mallace, the current VP, president, because the current incumbent president just hasn't proven to be competent enough to hold the title.