Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-4266719-20131230084111

Now Its just my luck that the whole Goldvane demotion "voting fraud" incident (shame on you Nults & rest), but I have 3 times in the future requested a change to the IAP. All three times the adminstration has denied or ignored my request with the exception of Parax (<3) agreeing with me... one time. We define inactivity as one month. For me, even that's too much. Without proper warning, if they dissappear for more than 20 days (in my opinion) they should be considered inactive.

But I've tried time and time again to change the time limit. Giving up on that. This request wil go into much, much more treacherous waters interms of controversy.

There should be some sort of... "moral" attachment to the IAP (as thats the only place this would go.) Lets take goldvane for example. Not to put him on the spot, but he's a fair example. Yes, he's active. But its become apparent (opinion-based) to some users including myself that his care, heart and soul for the preservation and good will of the wiki has been lost. If an Administrator/Rollback/Whatever no longer shows proper dedication and care to the wiki, they should be removed immediately from power.

I don't know the proper way to judge this, there really is none. Only a community vote would do that. But I request that there be some section along the lines of "if so and so is determined by a vote of his peers to be deemed as 'careless', so and so will be removed from power." After an initial vote on the SCC, if he/she is deemed "careless" the vote would go public.

Just a suggestion, and a dangerous one at that, but please read ok thx bi marracenjerry  4 3va.

Love everyone  