Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-4934912-20131210223143/@comment-1279322-20131210225045


 * 1) Pearson was not banned for failing to continue the blog. When he was told that he was not doing it quick enough (considering we gave him several weeks to do so), he responded negatively, resulting in his comments being deleted. He continued, and thus was rebanned. This behavior had been going on since he was unbanned 3 weeks ago, one of those conflicts resulting in him being blocked for a week when he refused to cease continuing it.
 * 2) He was not being "let back for good", his unban was temporary, an act of generosity for him so he could publish his blog.
 * 3) Banning a user for the previous 2 points is not trying to destroy the wiki. Do refrain from trying to slander us.
 * 4) I supported Pearson being allowed temporarily, provided it was solely for him to create and edit his list of top roleplayers, and that he would be watched carefully, given his past and behavior.
 * 5) Little-to-no positive contributions? From what I've seen, he's helped us greatly, such as keeping the order here from malicious users
 * 6) I find it ironic that a couple of those users happen to be people who dislike him for their own personal reasons, but that's besides the point.
 * 7) We're not going to judge a user's ability to administrate on their actions over on your wiki.
 * 8) So basically, him joking on a chat on a completely different wiki means that he should be demoted here. Right.