Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-3112181-20140711162552

Upon thinking over the events that occurred yesterday, this only seems necessary. It is nothing against G-Man. But, I won't make a speech out of this, so I guess I'll get right down to the facts.

G has, for lack of better words, made some controversial decisions in the past couple of days. First came his "plan" (I still don't fully understand it) which involved him temporarily resigning for an extended period of time in order to "work on a project". However, after only 24 hours he returned and demanded his admin abilities back as well as his vice presidency, due to a vote to unban blacklisted (we'll get to that). This by itself shows poor leadership skills. This isn't the first time G has demoted himself for whatever reason only to return and ask for his position back. Having administrative abilities is a privilege, and the way I see it, G takes them for granted. Certainly not something our vice president should be doing.

However, let's discuss what has been happening most recently. As per wiki policy, an infinitely banned user is exactly that: infinitely banned. However, G lobbied to have a certain blacklisted user (and other blacklisted users) unbanned, despite numerous futile previous attempts. The catch here is that G is an admin, and should understand that a blacklisted user shouldn't be welcome back. When he approached Par and myself with this, we reached a consensus that the vote should not be made, as the banned user in question is, as I mentioned, blacklisted and thus not allowed back at all. Nevertheless, G made the vote anyways, going behind the backs of his fellow admins. After the vote was taken down, he remade it, stating "if you want me to stop, you'll have to ban me." This is, in my opinion, not how an admin should behave.

Overall, G has had one too many controversies after another. He has shown an incoherent pattern of where his loyalties lie, and his multiple resignings/repromotings is completely irresponsible. He has been immature, aggressive, and went to ridiculous measures just to get a vote he wanted passed; such ridiculous measures that it's cost us two chat mods already. Furthermore, he has gone behind the back of the administration and only persisted when asked to stop. He has also stated, as per this snapchat courtesy of Blake Stewart Photography Studios Ltd., that he would like to "stay a little longer". "To argue". Yeah. This is our vice president.

Well, you know the procedure. Chat mods and rollback please vote, all others may give their input. If this passes, we'll bring it to a community vote. Granted, if that passes, and we demote G, we will find a temporary admin with community support until this mess is resolved and we get back on our feet. Cheers. 