Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-4934912-20131210223143/@comment-4934912-20131210225856

R.E.

1.) The first comment made on that blog by Garland was him saying that he had an intention to ban him. Obviously if somebody is threatened to be banned for doing nothing wrong, they're going to react negatively. Every positive and/or negative action has an equal positive/negative reaction. It's basic physics, really. Furthermore, I think Pearson was very upset by the fact that he'd been working much harder on this wiki than anyone else had, and the only appreciation he received was a ban threat.

2.) You obviously gave him the impression that he was. Either he was let back for good, and then you changed your mind, or you'd been manipulating him into believing that he was being let back for good all along. You don't have to play the goodcop with me Parax. I'm not going to call the police, or run to staff like some other friends of ours here do. Lol.

3.) Slandering can only be done in which the person being slandered is powerless to speak out against the slandering. This wiki spent two and a half years doing this. That's not exactly a strong-point of yours, so I'd avoid bringing it up if I were you.

4.) Stated above. ^

5.) I would love to see an in-depth list of these "great" contributions.

6.) Another thing I wouldn't try and use, seeing as this isn't a strongpoint of yours either, since, Pearson was obviously banned simply because Garland absolutely loaths him.

7.) It doesn't matter which wiki it's on, really. Vandalism violates the TOU, and so therefore, having a former vandalist here as an administrator isn't really condoning your "positive outlook" to the rest of the Wiki-wide community.

8.) Hey, I was banned for 2 years because somebody suspected me and Pearson used the same POTCO account, (a completely different website). So, to respond to that, I guess he should be demoted, unless that's assuming, this doesn't work both ways, and can only be used against me, and not Garland.

Thank you for taking the time to read my response. I appreciate it very much.