Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-4093783-20140303211229/@comment-3576775-20140306012516

I frankly don't understand why this would be necessary. (And no, that was not an invitation for a barrage of angry supporters to reply.) I completely support a ban on neutrality for the SSC, where only roll+ votes are counted, but why should roll+ votes be singled out on community votes? All votes carry equal weight for community decisions, regardless of what powers the user may have. This fact being considered, wouldn't neutral votes cast by regular users be just as "bad" as neutral votes cast by roll+ users? Sure, I agree that rolls+ should have conviction and make decisions that improve the wiki, but I fail to see how passing this request will promote that. If a lack of progress with community votes is a concern of the community, why wouldn't we ban neutral votes for all users? Just some food for thought. HEIL BOBICUS!