Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-3112181-20170507140453/@comment-3443450-20170508160816

Nults McKagan wrote: I'm open to it. I figure if he returns and breaks the rules again we can just re-ban him, but unless that happens, I don't see the point in keeping him (or most old, banned users for that matter) banned permanently. Switching to due to the details of Josh's wrongdoings coming to light. I'd be willing to reconsider if he was the one making the case for himself, instead of relying on random unban requests that he may not even return after. That being said, I still want an appeals process made for anybody who's been banned (even permanently), because I'm sure there are people who have been banned permanently who aren't just horrible people who don't deserve a second chance. This I think could be worth looking into