User blog comment:John Breasly/Problems This Wiki Needs to Address/@comment-3443450-20130128150227

Some parts of this blog I can agree with, but I'm gonna state my opinions on everything anyway :P

=Roleplay Council=

In the current position it is in right now, we don't need it at all. For one, numerous people have tried to many times to become ruler of a country. I see this as trying to power grab. If I tried to become king or leader of some country, and am denied. I would accept it, I would take it as an opportunity to learn something. Such as 1. I don't have the leadership skills. 2. I am not capable to be on game or wiki enough to rule something. 3. I am me :P. Anyway back to the point, the Roleplay Council has to much power, and the users are trying to give them more! I don't mean to be rude, but one point is: Goldvane was hoping that the council had the power to stop a war he didn't want! He should have acted mature, and done the SvS even though Al was acting supreme. I'm not saying Al was acting mature either, they both were being silly about the situation, but does that mean we go to the Council over something they cannot keep from happening? No. We should be able to take care of our own problems without having someone there to back us up.

=The Administration=

I can agree that they could do better, but the point is they have to deal with us. They have to deal with our arguments, fights, whining, everything we do! John, you have experience in administration, I wasn't here enough back then to know if it was good or bad (excluding the demotion part). But either way you should know the pressure the job can bring!


 * Kat - Yes, our president. Loyalty to her job... How long has she been working here? How much TIME has she put into this? The Admins in whole VOLUNTEER time that could be spent otherwise. By some users logic, this would mean they have no life. But guess what! They have to juggle this wiki and their lives around the clock!


 * Step - Ok, sure he may overreact at times. But say there is a situation on the wiki where a lot of users have broken numerous rules that would get them banned for a long time. Should he (a) Give the users a warning. (b) Ask them to stop. Or (c) Ban them all. The answer should be obvious to you, if it's not then there lies the problem. You have a different view of things then he does.


 * Goldvane - Yes, he shouldn't sit on the fence, he should do more of what his job requires. But with the wiki in factions, it makes sense to not want to join either side.

So where are the other admins? I thought you would point at all of their flaws... But ok.

=Certain Users=

You didn't really point out them, but you implied it so...


 * Jack Goldwrecker. - Where to begin... He's an impulsive guy trying to out think you with big words... Sure he's caused problems with other users. But wait... You failed to mention anything that didn't happen between you and him. Well that's fine I guess, what he did to you was wrong.


 * Nults McKagan - Awesome, so he sees you differently. Should we ban him? Well he hasn't broken any rule unless I'm mistaken... That's odd, you forgot to mention anything he did against other users also... I guess that's fine, you just didn't do research, you can add something in when you do add more.

In the ending of this part, I just want to say congratulations. Nults and Jack are leaving for the most part (other then Jack popping in here and there). So now two thorns in your side have been removed for the most part.

=Me=

I realize you aren't finished, but I'm going to be.


 * John Breasly - What do I think of John Breasly? At times he and I can be friends. While when something on the wiki breaks out he becomes a completely different person, going into a war-like mode to finish the "battle." What I don't understand is why he puts so much time into it. I mean he has already put so much time into England, why waste any more? Is it because he feels like he owes it to the wiki? Or is it because he is missing something, and is trying to fill that emptiness with a sense of accomplishment. I do not know if either of these things are correct. But whatever it is he hopes to do, I hope he does well.

=In closing=

I've said all I believe and think. Whoever wants to can attack this comment in every way they possibly can or want to. But in the end, it is just a comment. A speech from someone who you will never know. A thought from a stranger. Someones two cents. This comment is whatever you think it is, but it will never reply to you. It will never acknowledge you. It will never be a real person. It is the person behind the screen that has made this statement. While you try to reply to this comment, or make it talk. There will be others, spending their time helping do what we all should be here for. Growing, expanding, and helping the wiki.