Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-4266719-20130816033735/@comment-3112181-20130816034451

He has come back quite a bit and written some pretty fancy blogs about how he's "coming back for good". We've yet to actually see that though. I too am tired of him holding the title of administrator when he fails to actually administrate. The only problem is, we felt that three months was a generous amount of time for an admin to be away from the wiki, before being deemed inactive and demoted. Rather than change the policy, I wouldn't oppose writing a demotion request. We've given him more than enough chances to actually dedicate more than a few hour's worth of commenting and chatting to the wiki, yet I personally feel his performance as an administrator over the past months have been dissatisfactory.

So, in short, a demotion request should be written instead of changing the policy; because logically, he is "active" and doesn't violate the policy. If an agreement is reached, though, there may be a policy change in the future.

-- Jeremiah Garland