User blog comment:Jarod Pillagebane/Chat Rule Request: No Edits, No Service - Rewritten (& Ban Requests: Raven Potter, EmilyDarkvane, AngelDarkvane)/@comment-5169038-20120409150229/@comment-5169038-20120409151600

I strongely the rule, and the ban. What is wrong with them liking ' Harry Potter '? You're a chat moderator, and yet you purposely cross the word ' Odd ' out. I oppose the rule, because you don't not let someone on chat just because he/she has hardly any edits. 100 edits also, is a lot. It would take alot to get there, trust me. It's just chat, not some special privelige. And have you ever thought that she feels left out? This is what John is saying, or rather was saying, thanks to you. Do you ever even try to understand people's feelings? Maybe she feels nervous to talk, so she resorts to the things she is good at talking about, and has a hard time controlling her ' Annoying behavior '. I strongly oppose the ban. Especially coming from a chat moderator, I can't believe you would actually consider banning someone solely for the purpose of them being annoying to you, maybe when you might be making some of this up, maybe. It seems like the admins resort to banning the minute something goes wrong, and don't take time to think. Are any of you even capable of exploring the other possibilities? Maybe talk to her, and tell her why she is annoying? Maybe try to actually understand her feelings, and why she's like this? Wow.