User blog comment:Jeremiah Garland/The Fragile Subject of Religion.../@comment-2040576-20120825102508

Well, I am absolutely furious. Jack, I warned you yesterday to stop "pushing" your religion onto Law and Garland, and it seemed to stop, but only for a while. Unless another admin has already taken action against you, I am giving you an official warning, and should you continue this rampage you will get a strike.

Although I am a Christian, I fully back Garland on this one and I feel deeply sorry that someone of my faith has pestered him. In my belief, that is not the Christian way, and should not be the ways of any religion.

I am all for your proposal on the rule, and perhaps include the adjustment with politics as well? However, this means that with the rule being more specified I think it should also recieve greater consequences for being broken. If someone discriminates or tries to force their religion/political beliefs on anyone, I think a strike should be the immediate consequence.

One thing I would like to point out though, and do not dare think of ignoring this, is that people were immediately offended by his avatar of Jesus. Don't be hypocritical, as many of you in the past have used very offensive avatars ( no not the communist ones, I fail to see the offense in that ) such as the Swastika or Buddhist symbol, which is in fact a religious avatar, and despite the supposedly intended meaning of peace, it still upset some people, so I ask that that also ends. I am asking nicely, please stop using avatars that may offend others, just out of respect for your fellow wikians and if you hope to recieve the same respect.

Once again, I apologize Garland, and wish I was here to deal with it at the time. I see that thus far most the admins, including myself, agree to the change in the rule.