User blog comment:Parax./Community Vote: Prince Leon of England/@comment-3359524-20130104162851/@comment-4879311-20130104171951

I am voting because of how unproffesional, as Sharple stated, and biased it is. I am not saying he should not be banned, and anyways I doubt you would have been attacked by them because

1. Some users believe he can hack.

2. Most of the people think he should be banned.

3. Most of the opposers are not saying he should be banned.

They think he is as bad as Pearson, some say worse. Notice if you check, before Sharple commented and voted, everyone was in full of support. It was 16 - 6 Support before, now its 16-11 Oppose because of what everyone realized, what Sharple is saying. Yes some of the opposers do just want him to stay, but most are saying he should still be banned but just not in this manner.

And it is biased. They were attacked or whatever involvement with Leon they had that made them victims, and now you're asking the people that got shot in the face "Should he be executed?" You guys are like the jury. And have an unbiased view of it, but asking them is where it becomes biased. We do want a fair voice, but this is not what I had in mind as a fair voice.