Board Thread:The Seven Seas Court/@comment-3242795-20140716203050/@comment-4879311-20140716221547

G-man. wrote:

John Breasly wrote:

G-man. wrote:

Lord Andrew Mallace wrote: Goldtimbers, you have 3 times said, both on my SCC, my promo and now this that we need to "cut down" on the number of mods/promos/dems

Why is it then, as proved by John's several earlier screenshot, every morning/late night Im' on there are 0 mods?

That is less a reason than a fear; debunked by cold, hard facts. That's beside the point. You're now the mod on at those times, and this request would not affect the number of people moderating chat.

It would ease the weight on Parax, would it not? I don't think it's very stressful looking at the results of a promotion/demotion request and clicking on a checkbox to promote or demote the subject of said request.

Based off the history of this wiki, a Bureaucrat isnt some person that just "checks boxes" though. Remember when Pistol became President? The Administration was practically in shambles and Pistol eventually went inactive. If Par hadn't been promoted, we would have drifted into inactivity much faster. We still are not out of the thick of it because constantly there is too much drama that is being refused to be fixed by some members. Votes that are passed that won't be added to policy or enforced for months because there is no member that is dedicated enough other than Jeremiah.

Also, what if Par needs time for himself? And what if during that time only ONE ADMIN was active? Based off our staff numbers it isnt very unlikely and more and more I see Par not able to attend to matters less and less which makes the situation all more likely. This is not only just for a few "boxes to be checked" but for relief of our President, and we want to deny that? Furthermore, what if Par (and I am not accusing he would do such a thing) sponataneously went inactive? Then which Bur would lead us? Par may neve rknow if he will lose Internet or have an increase in problems in the real world.